Mobile Phone Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 3 June 2012

Effective Group Work

Posted on 08:41 by Unknown
Venn diagrams Alex is just back from the HEA Arts and Humanities conference 2012 and among the nuggets I gleaned from his writeup was this:
all group-produced material was assessed formatively, by peers; only individual (reflective) material was assessed summatively – thus removing the usual complaints that some group members weren’t pulling their weight.
I have constantly struggled to get group work to be worth the trouble it causes. Don't get me wrong, it's not that I think that group work is unimportant, but if it's not assessed they don't do it, and if it is, all the bickering takes so much of mine and their time that it's better not to bother. I like this halfway house approach, allowing the freeloaders to miss out on formative assessment.


A.J. Cann
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Assessment, Feedback, Higher Education | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Student feedback using Google+
    Whether or not you take a constructivist view of education, feedback on performance is inevitably seen as a crucial component of the proces...
  • An Introduction to Teaching With Social Media #cll1213
    Tomorrow I'm off to: Changing the Learning Landscape – The Use of Social Media in Science and Technology Teaching and Learning ( #cll12...
  • Positive academic outcomes of Facebook use
    Chan, C.L., Fu, W.E., Lai, K.R., and  Tseng, S.F. (2013) Feasibility study of using social networks platform for learning support: an exampl...
  • The Information
    Among my holiday reading was James Gleick's The Information . Blurb: " a chronicle that shows how information has become the moder...
  • Certifiable
    A.J. Cann
  • Biology Open Educational Resources
    The Society of Biology has launched a new website which aims to identify, collect and promote existing bioscience open educational resource...
  • Why Good Classes Fail
    "The problem of why good classes fail has become a bit of an obsession for me lately. I visit several colleges and universities every s...
  • Why I didn't sign up for #oldsmooc
    I would like to have signed up for the OU's learning design MOOC , but I have a list of reasons why I didn't: I'm trying to be ...
  • Meanwhile, over at the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog
    Preventing rigour mortis: our migration to social media does not spell the end of academic rigour "Academic research involving social ...
  • Learning by doing
    For the past 24 hours I've been playing around with Google Sites for a project which ... I can't talk about yet. After the initial...

Categories

  • 2b2k
  • Aggregation
  • alt-c
  • altmetrics
  • AoB
  • Art
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • BeyondGoogle
  • Biology
  • BioSET
  • Blackboard
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Careers
  • Checklists
  • Conference
  • Connectivity
  • Copyright
  • Curation
  • DarkSocial
  • digilit
  • distance learning
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engagement
  • Environment
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • FriendFeed
  • Futurology
  • Genetics
  • Google
  • Google+
  • Higher Education
  • History
  • Humour
  • IDontHaveATagForThis
  • Impact
  • iPad
  • JISC
  • Leicester
  • Library
  • Life
  • Links
  • Marketing
  • Maths
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Mobile
  • MOOC
  • Music
  • OER
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review
  • Open Science
  • Photography
  • Plagiarism
  • PLE
  • PLN
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Postgraduate
  • Publishing
  • QRcode
  • R
  • Recipe
  • REF
  • Reflection
  • Research
  • RHelp
  • RSS
  • Science
  • SmallWorlds
  • SOAR
  • Social Networks
  • Sport
  • Statistics
  • Tagging
  • Technology
  • VandR
  • Video
  • visualization
  • Web 3.0
  • wiki
  • Writing
  • Xerte

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (204)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2012 (259)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ▼  June (32)
      • In previous years
      • Searching for the Grail
      • Reflections on #ST101 - first 24 hours
      • Why it doesn't pay to be creative
      • Today's the day #ST101
      • Commenting
      • MSc in Learning Innovation
      • Milestones
      • Thinking about feedback
      • Constructivism, Roberts, and Susans
      • Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Ed...
      • Education research in PeerJ?
      • Presenting via a Google+ Hangout #GEUG12
      • Google Apps for Education European User Group meet...
      • Hangouts are the spice of life?
      • Reflection on how far we've come
      • Google Analytics - so cool, sooo complicated :-)
      • Learning styles: where’s the evidence?
      • Altmetric It. Maybe.
      • A failed experiment
      • Inherently fuzzy
      • Any good blogger has to know what their readers want
      • What can you get for $1000?
      • Gems from #EASEconference
      • Gimme some love
      • Social Tools and Academic Publishing
      • Plum Analytics dodgy data
      • A Rough Guide to Google Analytics [free webcast]
      • Edu-bloggers survey
      • Effective Group Work
      • Prometheus (3D) - my complete review (in 2D)
      • HEA STEM: Qualitative Approaches to Pedagogical Re...
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2011 (37)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile