Mobile Phone Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 14 November 2011

How to fix academic publishing again already

Posted on 01:12 by Unknown
The Digital Library Last week I was ranting about academic publishing.

A paper I submitted to a journal in June was finally reviewed. Two referees liked it and suggested some helpful modifications, the third referee wrote incomprehensible nonsense, quoting lots of sentences which were not in the manuscript (go figure). On 23rd October I was asked to submit a revised manuscript, but because the journal is moving from one publisher to another (you can probably figure out who it is), I was told:
"We are in the process of moving to our new Open Access publisher so watch out for new information on how to submit your revised manuscript."

So I waited.
On Friday 11th November I received two emails. One was from the journal, saying:
"This e-mail is simply a reminder that your revision is due in one week. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within one week, we will consider your paper as a new submission."

Sigh. I have resubmitted the revised version I have been waiting to send for the last month. The other email was from the manager of our institutional repository, saying:
"...for the month of October one of your publications archived on the Leicester Research Archive was accessed 373 times:
Reflective Social Portfolios for Feedback and Peer Mentoring (Cann, Alan James et al)
This made it the 2nd most accessed Leicester research publication on the Leicester Research Archive (LRA) last month."
I really have just about had it with academic publishers. Unless someone gets an arXiv-style post-publication peer review education journal going soon, (I'm looking at you Weller ;-) with these numbers, I can't see any alternative but to simply submit my future papers to the repository, and the publishers can go and (rest deleted of sentence deleted).

So here's a message to all repository managers:

Give me my personal impact data. I need to know how many people are reading what I write and who (i.e. where) they are. That data trumps journal citation factors. Give me that and the repository becomes my first choice publishing destination.


Tweet
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Impact, Library, Publishing, Research | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Student feedback using Google+
    Whether or not you take a constructivist view of education, feedback on performance is inevitably seen as a crucial component of the proces...
  • An Introduction to Teaching With Social Media #cll1213
    Tomorrow I'm off to: Changing the Learning Landscape – The Use of Social Media in Science and Technology Teaching and Learning ( #cll12...
  • Positive academic outcomes of Facebook use
    Chan, C.L., Fu, W.E., Lai, K.R., and  Tseng, S.F. (2013) Feasibility study of using social networks platform for learning support: an exampl...
  • Certifiable
    A.J. Cann
  • The Information
    Among my holiday reading was James Gleick's The Information . Blurb: " a chronicle that shows how information has become the moder...
  • Biology Open Educational Resources
    The Society of Biology has launched a new website which aims to identify, collect and promote existing bioscience open educational resource...
  • The WordPress.com Reader
    I'm still pretty happy with The Old Reader , apart from the inability to organize feeds in folders and lingering concerns about the sus...
  • Why Good Classes Fail
    "The problem of why good classes fail has become a bit of an obsession for me lately. I visit several colleges and universities every s...
  • Why I didn't sign up for #oldsmooc
    I would like to have signed up for the OU's learning design MOOC , but I have a list of reasons why I didn't: I'm trying to be ...
  • Learning Outcomes - the wrong way round
    Martin Weller was questioning the value of learning outcomes on Twitter this morning, asking whether anyone ever reads them, and noting:...

Categories

  • 2b2k
  • Aggregation
  • alt-c
  • altmetrics
  • AoB
  • Art
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • BeyondGoogle
  • Biology
  • BioSET
  • Blackboard
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Careers
  • Checklists
  • Conference
  • Connectivity
  • Copyright
  • Curation
  • DarkSocial
  • digilit
  • distance learning
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engagement
  • Environment
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • FriendFeed
  • Futurology
  • Genetics
  • Google
  • Google+
  • Higher Education
  • History
  • Humour
  • IDontHaveATagForThis
  • Impact
  • iPad
  • JISC
  • Leicester
  • Library
  • Life
  • Links
  • Marketing
  • Maths
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Mobile
  • MOOC
  • Music
  • OER
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review
  • Open Science
  • Photography
  • Plagiarism
  • PLE
  • PLN
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Postgraduate
  • Publishing
  • QRcode
  • R
  • Recipe
  • REF
  • Reflection
  • Research
  • RHelp
  • RSS
  • Science
  • SmallWorlds
  • SOAR
  • Social Networks
  • Sport
  • Statistics
  • Tagging
  • Technology
  • VandR
  • Video
  • visualization
  • Web 3.0
  • wiki
  • Writing
  • Xerte

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (204)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2012 (259)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ▼  2011 (37)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ▼  November (20)
      • Social begins to bite
      • Integrating Teaching and Research in Undergraduate...
      • Wonkypedia
      • Blessed are the trolls for they shall dwell in the...
      • Access to Scientific Publications: The Scientist's...
      • Bowling Alone
      • Deeply Unfashionable
      • Education researchers’ perceptions of open access ...
      • Fun and Fear in Open Spaces
      • SciReadr Book Group
      • In Which Our Hero Convinces Reluctant Academics By...
      • How to fix academic publishing again already
      • Phishing
      • Wit's End
      • Falling out of love?
      • Impact - intrinsic or bust?
      • A nice surprise from #altc2011
      • University of Leicester R User Group #UoLRUG
      • Aarrghhh!
      • Open?
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile