Mobile Phone Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 19 October 2012

Learning Outcomes - the wrong way round

Posted on 05:28 by Unknown
Target Martin Weller was questioning the value of learning outcomes on Twitter this morning, asking whether anyone ever reads them, and noting:
"...they've rather taken on a language of their own which bears a resemblance to English but isn't quite."
Do learning outcomes have any value? Like all aspects of education fossilized by officialdom, no.

Except that, in each of the MOOCs I have experimented with over the past few months, I have been careful to set my own learning outcomes at the beginning, and to measure my achievement against these, rather than any externally-imposed criteria set by someone else. So learning outcomes do have value - we've just got them the wrong way round.

See: Micropedagogy and Macropedagogy







A.J. Cann
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Higher Education, MOOC | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

Categories

  • 2b2k
  • Aggregation
  • alt-c
  • altmetrics
  • AoB
  • Art
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • BeyondGoogle
  • Biology
  • BioSET
  • Blackboard
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Careers
  • Checklists
  • Conference
  • Connectivity
  • Copyright
  • Curation
  • DarkSocial
  • digilit
  • distance learning
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engagement
  • Environment
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • FriendFeed
  • Futurology
  • Genetics
  • Google
  • Google+
  • Higher Education
  • History
  • Humour
  • IDontHaveATagForThis
  • Impact
  • iPad
  • JISC
  • Leicester
  • Library
  • Life
  • Links
  • Marketing
  • Maths
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Mobile
  • MOOC
  • Music
  • OER
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review
  • Open Science
  • Photography
  • Plagiarism
  • PLE
  • PLN
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Postgraduate
  • Publishing
  • QRcode
  • R
  • Recipe
  • REF
  • Reflection
  • Research
  • RHelp
  • RSS
  • Science
  • SmallWorlds
  • SOAR
  • Social Networks
  • Sport
  • Statistics
  • Tagging
  • Technology
  • VandR
  • Video
  • visualization
  • Web 3.0
  • wiki
  • Writing
  • Xerte

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (204)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2012 (259)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ▼  October (25)
      • E-Learning in the 21st Century
      • Coursera Peer Assessment - Writing in the Sciences
      • Visualization or curation?
      • The Effect of Clickers in University Science Courses
      • Everything gives you cancer
      • Nature goes all altmetrics
      • A little more #DarkSocial advice
      • Better than nothing at all?
      • Engaging by Talking: An Agile and Effective Approa...
      • Identity theft?
      • Now in Chinese!
      • Learning Outcomes - the wrong way round
      • SpotOn London 2012 #solo12
      • Closing the loop
      • Die, EndNote, Die
      • #DarkSocial - The Results Are In
      • Dutch disease and the failure of OER initiatives
      • The Week The MOOCing Had To Stop #cfhe12
      • Coursera Weekly Reflection 07.10.12
      • Social Media: New Editing Tools or Weapons of Mass...
      • Francis Spufford
      • Selling science by the pixel
      • Google+ Ripples
      • 5:2 diet data for @DrMichaelMosley
      • Red Plenty - A Russian Fairytale
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2011 (37)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile