Mobile Phone Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Soft science. The softer the better.

Posted on 08:48 by Unknown
This popped up a couple of days ago on an email discussion list (yes, they still exist ;-) Worth sharing:

The health professional education community is struggling with a number of issues regarding the place and value of research in the field, including: the role of theory-building versus applied research; the relative value of generalisable versus contextually rich, localised solutions, and the relative value of local versus multi-institutional research. In part, these debates are limited by the fact that the health professional education community has become deeply entrenched in the notion of the physical sciences as presenting a model for ‘ideal’ research. The resulting emphasis on an ‘imperative of proof’ in our dominant research approaches has translated poorly to the domain of education, with a resulting denigration of the domain as ‘soft’ and ‘unscientific’ and a devaluing of knowledge acquired to date. Similarly, our adoption of the physical sciences ‘imperative of generalisable simplicity’ has created difficulties for our ability to represent well the complexity of the social interactions that shape education and learning at a local level.
Using references to the scientific paradigms associated with the physical sciences, this paper will reconsider the place of our current goals for education research in the production and evolution of knowledge within our community, and will explore the implications for enhancing the value of research in health professional education.
Reorienting education research from its alignment with the imperative of proof to one with an imperative of understanding, and from the imperative of simplicity to an imperative of representing complexity well may enable a shift in research focus away from a problematic search for proofs of simple generalisable solutions to our collective problems, towards the generation of rich understandings of the complex environments in which our collective problems are uniquely embedded.


It’s NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education (2010) Medical Education 44(1): 31-39, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x



A.J. Cann
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Higher Education, Medicine, Research | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Student feedback using Google+
    Whether or not you take a constructivist view of education, feedback on performance is inevitably seen as a crucial component of the proces...
  • An Introduction to Teaching With Social Media #cll1213
    Tomorrow I'm off to: Changing the Learning Landscape – The Use of Social Media in Science and Technology Teaching and Learning ( #cll12...
  • Positive academic outcomes of Facebook use
    Chan, C.L., Fu, W.E., Lai, K.R., and  Tseng, S.F. (2013) Feasibility study of using social networks platform for learning support: an exampl...
  • Certifiable
    A.J. Cann
  • The Information
    Among my holiday reading was James Gleick's The Information . Blurb: " a chronicle that shows how information has become the moder...
  • Biology Open Educational Resources
    The Society of Biology has launched a new website which aims to identify, collect and promote existing bioscience open educational resource...
  • The WordPress.com Reader
    I'm still pretty happy with The Old Reader , apart from the inability to organize feeds in folders and lingering concerns about the sus...
  • Why Good Classes Fail
    "The problem of why good classes fail has become a bit of an obsession for me lately. I visit several colleges and universities every s...
  • Why I didn't sign up for #oldsmooc
    I would like to have signed up for the OU's learning design MOOC , but I have a list of reasons why I didn't: I'm trying to be ...
  • Learning Outcomes - the wrong way round
    Martin Weller was questioning the value of learning outcomes on Twitter this morning, asking whether anyone ever reads them, and noting:...

Categories

  • 2b2k
  • Aggregation
  • alt-c
  • altmetrics
  • AoB
  • Art
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • BeyondGoogle
  • Biology
  • BioSET
  • Blackboard
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Careers
  • Checklists
  • Conference
  • Connectivity
  • Copyright
  • Curation
  • DarkSocial
  • digilit
  • distance learning
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engagement
  • Environment
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • FriendFeed
  • Futurology
  • Genetics
  • Google
  • Google+
  • Higher Education
  • History
  • Humour
  • IDontHaveATagForThis
  • Impact
  • iPad
  • JISC
  • Leicester
  • Library
  • Life
  • Links
  • Marketing
  • Maths
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Mobile
  • MOOC
  • Music
  • OER
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review
  • Open Science
  • Photography
  • Plagiarism
  • PLE
  • PLN
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Postgraduate
  • Publishing
  • QRcode
  • R
  • Recipe
  • REF
  • Reflection
  • Research
  • RHelp
  • RSS
  • Science
  • SmallWorlds
  • SOAR
  • Social Networks
  • Sport
  • Statistics
  • Tagging
  • Technology
  • VandR
  • Video
  • visualization
  • Web 3.0
  • wiki
  • Writing
  • Xerte

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (204)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2012 (259)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ▼  May (23)
      • Comparisons
      • How do you measure the effectiveness of feedback?
      • Fun on Friday
      • Creativity is Not a Thing
      • Podcasting for the 21st Century?
      • Maybe the sky really is falling
      • Open Access to US Federally Funded Research
      • Rethinking facebook, and the value of open
      • Why is Google+ ?
      • Floatation device
      • Should I stay or should I go?
      • Soft science. The softer the better.
      • Online peer-assessment in a large first-year class
      • Infographics
      • A taxonomy of edublogs
      • Playing with Hangouts On Air
      • Grinding it out
      • The Digital Human
      • In the other place this week
      • Scratchings
      • Decoupling the scholarly journal
      • Followers
      • Wikipedia's barnstarring performance
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2011 (37)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile