Mobile Phone Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 29 April 2013

Chipping away at the establishment

Posted on 05:09 by Unknown
Titanic I continue to have conversations with publishers in various fields, and the outcome is always the same "it's not as bad as you say it is". So I have no doubt that they will be able to ignore this latest piece of evidence in much the same way they have pretended to ignore all the previous evidence, while continuing to rearrange the deck chairs.

Are elite journals declining? Why, yes they are. So if you're not an elite journal ... come in number 42, your time is up.


Are elite journals declining? arXiv:1304.6460
Previous work indicates that over the past 20 years, the highest quality work have been published in an increasingly diverse and larger group of journals. In this paper we examine whether this diversification has also affected the handful of elite journals that are traditionally considered to be the best. We examine citation patterns over the past 40 years of 7 long-standing traditionally elite journals and 6 journals that have been increasing in importance over the past 20 years. To be among the top 5% or 1% cited papers, papers now need about twice as many citations as they did 40 years ago. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s elite journals have been publishing a decreasing proportion of these top cited papers. This also applies to the two journals that are typically considered as the top venues and often used as bibliometric indicators of "excellence", Science and Nature. On the other hand, several new and established journals are publishing an increasing proportion of most cited papers. These changes bring new challenges and opportunities for all parties. Journals can enact policies to increase or maintain their relative position in the journal hierarchy. Researchers now have the option to publish in more diverse venues knowing that their work can still reach the same audiences. Finally, evaluators and administrators need to know that although there will always be a certain prestige associated with publishing in "elite" journals, journal hierarchies are in constant flux so inclusion of journals into this group is not permanent.





A.J. Cann
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Publishing, Science | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Student feedback using Google+
    Whether or not you take a constructivist view of education, feedback on performance is inevitably seen as a crucial component of the proces...
  • An Introduction to Teaching With Social Media #cll1213
    Tomorrow I'm off to: Changing the Learning Landscape – The Use of Social Media in Science and Technology Teaching and Learning ( #cll12...
  • Positive academic outcomes of Facebook use
    Chan, C.L., Fu, W.E., Lai, K.R., and  Tseng, S.F. (2013) Feasibility study of using social networks platform for learning support: an exampl...
  • Certifiable
    A.J. Cann
  • The Information
    Among my holiday reading was James Gleick's The Information . Blurb: " a chronicle that shows how information has become the moder...
  • Biology Open Educational Resources
    The Society of Biology has launched a new website which aims to identify, collect and promote existing bioscience open educational resource...
  • The WordPress.com Reader
    I'm still pretty happy with The Old Reader , apart from the inability to organize feeds in folders and lingering concerns about the sus...
  • Why Good Classes Fail
    "The problem of why good classes fail has become a bit of an obsession for me lately. I visit several colleges and universities every s...
  • Why I didn't sign up for #oldsmooc
    I would like to have signed up for the OU's learning design MOOC , but I have a list of reasons why I didn't: I'm trying to be ...
  • Learning Outcomes - the wrong way round
    Martin Weller was questioning the value of learning outcomes on Twitter this morning, asking whether anyone ever reads them, and noting:...

Categories

  • 2b2k
  • Aggregation
  • alt-c
  • altmetrics
  • AoB
  • Art
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • BeyondGoogle
  • Biology
  • BioSET
  • Blackboard
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Careers
  • Checklists
  • Conference
  • Connectivity
  • Copyright
  • Curation
  • DarkSocial
  • digilit
  • distance learning
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Engagement
  • Environment
  • Facebook
  • Feedback
  • FriendFeed
  • Futurology
  • Genetics
  • Google
  • Google+
  • Higher Education
  • History
  • Humour
  • IDontHaveATagForThis
  • Impact
  • iPad
  • JISC
  • Leicester
  • Library
  • Life
  • Links
  • Marketing
  • Maths
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Mobile
  • MOOC
  • Music
  • OER
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review
  • Open Science
  • Photography
  • Plagiarism
  • PLE
  • PLN
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Postgraduate
  • Publishing
  • QRcode
  • R
  • Recipe
  • REF
  • Reflection
  • Research
  • RHelp
  • RSS
  • Science
  • SmallWorlds
  • SOAR
  • Social Networks
  • Sport
  • Statistics
  • Tagging
  • Technology
  • VandR
  • Video
  • visualization
  • Web 3.0
  • wiki
  • Writing
  • Xerte

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (204)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ▼  April (20)
      • Chipping away at the establishment
      • Assessment feedback only on demand: Supporting the...
      • Education versus Entertainment: Informal Learning ...
      • Google Docs Voice Comments
      • Make Some Noise
      • Engaging by Talking: Audio Feedback #HEASTEM13
      • Bloom's Taxonomy Visualized
      • Making Movies - PowerPoint Slide Shows
      • Employability versus Biology
      • Writing Support
      • Today I will mostly be at:
      • Consolidation
      • After "After Reader" comes "After Tweetdeck"
      • Ding Dong
      • Try, try and fail again
      • The Missing Links 7th April 2013
      • When is a MOOC not a MOOC?
      • Tadpole Shrimps and Evolution
      • Forget flipping the classroom, flip assessment
      • Choosing a curation service
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2012 (259)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2011 (37)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile